Call for Papers »
The Arizona State Sports and Entertainment Law Journal has issued a Call for Papers. Please read the attached document for …
“Drinking the Claws” and Beverage Laws: The Helter-Skelter of Hard Seltzer and Alcohol Regulation During COVID-19 »
By: Mark Edward Blankenship, Jr.
You may have heard of the phrase, “There ain’t no laws when drinking the claws.” This originated from …
Domestic Violence in the NHL: Is No Policy Really the Best Policy? »
By: Jacob Wiese
Reports surrounding Nashville Predators forward Austin Watson have many sports fans questioning why there is an apparent …
Attack of the Copyright Bots »
By: Charles Klass
Pianist James Rhodes was shocked to see Facebook had muted the video uploaded to his fanpage of his …
UFC’s Encouraging Partnership with USADA »
By: Yoonho Ji
The California State Athletic Commission determined that the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) light-heavyweight championship bout between Jon Jones …
Collusion or Delusion? Colin Kaepernick’s Potential Claim Against the NFL »
By: Brooks Brennan
Last season, former San Francisco 49er quarterback Colin Kaepernick made news waves by spearheading a controversial protest of …
Forensics Meets Music »
By: Amena Khestchin-Kamel
The Question
The question when it comes to plagiarism in the Music Industry is can judges and jurors really …
Public Funding of Professional Sports Arenas »
Cities and states typically grant large subsidies for new venues that host professional sports teams. These subsidies come in the form of tax-exempt bonds, which are typically repaid over many years using levies, such as sales or hotel taxes. Investors who purchase these bonds do not pay taxes on their income, which allows for cheaper interest rates and lower costs on projects. Are these bonds mutually beneficial to both team owners, who advocate for the venues, and localities to justify granting bonds to build the venues? - Read more...
12